From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 61F003858410; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 10:04:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 61F003858410
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701684293;
	bh=74j2fqUeZMKIJscQUAm4OxxKVptSnOQhj+Ly69ZLtWo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VqwhUxZIIAVVj8JYqDUz4sgjXwpboyTfKhuYcZXDgEKzXSNMSucdtc+rlr7/VgG2b
	 pVKZk/zd552CqueOzYg7GU3bNeVGL5YetPdAW1rxSw2AYC99NNCcW33Xz4Bmb1C0ow
	 akhy9AjaWipiz6xjqHsExLQTiI8S1FmIkbGDG0Ig=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112824] Stack spills and vector splitting with
 vector builtins
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 10:04:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-112824-4-vmoo7Ezrto@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112824

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-12-04
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On GIMPLE there's nothing wrong I think.  There's some inconsistency in
representing a splat where when we have a scalar source we use a CONSTRUCTOR
but when we have a (multi-use) vector we use a VEC_PERM to splat its
first element (but I guess that's actually good in the end).=