public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112827] New: ICE on valid code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 18:43:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112827-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112827

            Bug ID: 112827
           Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu:
                    Segmentation fault
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
  Target Milestone: ---

This appears to be a recent regression as it does not reproduce with 13.2. 

Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/4EhdjPE6o

[507] % gcctk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcctk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/local/home/suz/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231202 (experimental) (GCC) 
[508] % 
[508] % gcctk -O1 small.c
during GIMPLE pass: sccp
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:2:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
    2 | int main() {
      |     ^~~~
0x105e273 crash_signal
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/toplev.cc:316
0x1149492 gimple_bb(gimple const*)
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple.h:1908
0x1149492 instantiate_scev_name
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:2263
0x1149492 instantiate_scev_r
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:2637
0x1149dee instantiate_scev(edge_def*, loop*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:2719
0x114bae9 instantiate_parameters(loop*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.h:64
0x114bae9 simplify_peeled_chrec
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1344
0x11488a6 analyze_evolution_in_loop
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1455
0x11488a6 interpret_loop_phi
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1587
0x11488a6 analyze_scalar_evolution_1
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1975
0x114849a analyze_scalar_evolution_1
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1958
0x1148e24 analyze_scalar_evolution(loop*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:2039
0x11483ee interpret_condition_phi
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1611
0x11483ee analyze_scalar_evolution_1
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1977
0x1148e24 analyze_scalar_evolution(loop*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:2039
0x114abd2 interpret_rhs_expr
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1641
0x1148579 interpret_gimple_assign
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1919
0x1148579 analyze_scalar_evolution_1
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1970
0x1148e24 analyze_scalar_evolution(loop*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:2039
0x114abd2 interpret_rhs_expr
        ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc:1641
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
[509] % 
[509] % cat small.c
int a, b, c, d, e;
int main() {
  for (; c; c++) {
    for (a = 0; a < 2; a++)
      ;
    for (; b; b++) {
      e = d;
      d = a;
    }
  }
  return 0;
}

             reply	other threads:[~2023-12-02 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-02 18:43 zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch [this message]
2023-12-02 18:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/112827] [14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03  9:18 ` zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-12-04  7:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04  9:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04 11:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05  7:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-09 15:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-112827-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).