From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9A46B3858C5E; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:24:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9A46B3858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701689065; bh=jYchwk/uXwPIziun9oaE265DpyOn+6eFNYmIO4vAfu4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NW82+Y55VguBaBpnNgi+NmSZVqED8G+HfyXRl4NKg8MqHc4s/xnXaZ5k46XIe69cH bsGbBLk1RyjanKuBK+M0krr/Lnf3cesnGg2hMRgt6FsvPYF6l/nsp1T8dDZJOTcvbO qkMs75Ar1TZRYyqEuFOzohTgP/egHZgnxeXVC5Yg= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/112838] Compiler is unable to show the exact error location when calling copy ctor for a non-copyable object Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 11:24:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112838 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Confirmed, I thought I had saw an issue filed that is very smilar to this. See PR 80858 (and PR 58589) and PR 106176 and PR 90413 and others. I created PR 109551 for the underlying front-end issue. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109551 ***=