From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 47D643858C98; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:48:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 47D643858C98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701704921; bh=9htlCb/8NNF1ur/T7EC5rA73BeNT/Pl560butqUL+7w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CdikEA2XA6Jm4fKbhc1yNQkqogR1BZ9OlGzUjPxC+gyfsztLICmv0n2JU4S4jmx9l etjxxCejDF7XwoCSlsgaxGDol462GPqnpFFlCmHxBV5eZPJ36v1mRH3RsIjQb4o/tK qcAnj/PzZ7CEmFMLUCbjEKtsKoV9TNWRy7c0Ad6M= From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTEyODQ2XSBbMTQgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0gbnZwdHg6?= =?UTF-8?B?ICdGQUlMOiBnKysuZGcvYWJpL2Fub242LkMgIC1zdGQ9YysrMjAgIHNjYW4t?= =?UTF-8?B?YXNzZW1ibGVyIF9aNWR1bW15SVh0bDh3cmFwcGVyMUlkRXRsTlMxX1V0X0Vk?= =?UTF-8?B?aTlSaWdodE5hbWV0bE5TMl9VdF9FZGk5UmlnaHROYW1lTGQ0MDVlYzAwMDAw?= =?UTF-8?B?MDAwMDAwRUVFRUVFdnYn?= Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 15:48:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112846 Thomas Schwinge changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112847 CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Same as for PR112847, the issue disappears if I revert commit r14-6064-gc3f281a0c1ca50e4df5049923aa2f5d1c3c39ff6 "c++: mangle function template constraints". I don't know yet (a) what that means, and (b) why n= vptx target behaves differently from everything else.=