From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 027FE3858D28; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 15:49:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 027FE3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701704946;
	bh=utKseg81MKjEwRCLZrg/kWM3pL0jc6ewKgvfbXX4WI4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vBaPmBM1RCuhPth1fGuSOQkG2Lle+AK5yEVjPq4dRmwmuQuttYBS2QgkX5N984jOh
	 5VpVZCPVPy4WzA4nbsutQNiUvVj9nYo1Q6EdD+isZt5j4Ue2OJvW3B4aIwyxdLNNYv
	 1H3Q4KQbdtOMm1kphMvf/mzNNwMN7OnSQWsyK3bY=
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/112847] [14 Regression] nvptx: 'FAIL:
 g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-explicit-inst1.C  -std=c++20  scan-assembler
 _Z1gI1XEvT_', 'scan-assembler _Z1gI1YEvT_'
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 15:49:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-112847-4-NRAzb0nxIj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112847

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Same as for PR112846, the issue disappears if I revert commit
r14-6064-gc3f281a0c1ca50e4df5049923aa2f5d1c3c39ff6 "c++: mangle function
template constraints".  I don't know yet (a) what that means, and (b) why n=
vptx
target behaves differently from everything else.=