From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 36B8B3858423; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 14:42:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 36B8B3858423 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701787371; bh=n/yH5FRe4bsp1rDYa3pm+dARXl+wmi4EnDjZtbKru6g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mQAh/sWPN80jaqwhbA+ZfUJ5vAoORfwAISpPy+dXj1B/oJ8aqNKyL0YBC1rnmUbjk fVKPede5zkTLUXP2bj0obIvhP2jx6bQ0oKwPuK1ZhjGCS0xaaOZSQ2khBeyiUCa5Ip EpfaNx/CRyflqsWMK7Jn1p0pi0e46M767QJc1cI0= From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112853] RISC-V: RVV: SPEC2017 525.x264 regression Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:42:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112853 --- Comment #7 from Robin Dapp --- Ah, forgot three tests: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-cond-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr101668.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr101668.c execution test On vlen=3D512 gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_8.f90 gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 are gone again, the rest is similar. Are those the unstable ones?=