From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6341C3858403; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 08:03:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6341C3858403 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701763402; bh=3LEko09jgv0vLEsQlECtqxSwQXrcLMGSHbk7Qu3rR9c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CfjbG4C/ey6c+L9092oXXAPxpBUd36IT5ScnR3EwYO1qaNRoMbGiSv5NnDbsMxz7I /+GGnWmquJ9R06Uq6o2dMHqPP9NUnCf1G91/gwsB0D+wP8MIvrCZ7fCf+abfUN3cWA 0EmycUBqbxP+S3Tj69n4CoHJUDxQxZJwDLZoCDeU= From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/112854] [14] RISCV ICE: expand: in store_integral_bit_field, at expmed.cc:1049 on rv32gcv_zvl1024b --param=riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:03:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112854 --- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp --- Hehe I was hoping we wouldn't hit a vec_set on a mask but apparently this happens as well. We don't have a pattern for that either, yet. Thanks for the test. I would expect this to be fixed in a similar way to t= he vec_extract problem but let's see.=