From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5DBE73858C2F; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 21:36:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5DBE73858C2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701898563; bh=Z8Aj08NeXX7DV7g/KTPhlkz8OIImMG528gxafnphQ7k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ouuWf6knCi10UlJ3bk7gPfv0wbnPyr/kDvS2OkByGjc2+AEcz8C3fPmyxCu+8NFfj KxIijwX5SrkQyby40lerQpj2i1Wjrbce44rgwF8wI4nrV/fr5R+qnVCuHksKuAgxnM HyArg5fd+sVgiQ8L2VMBSHp4FltyLDgmKB3pggCA= From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/112858] [14 Regression] nvptx: 'unresolved symbol __cxa_thread_atexit_impl' Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 21:36:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112858 Alexandre Oliva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- Thanks for the report, sorry about the regressions. The faulty patch was reverted, another patch with this and other problems fixed will be pushed shortly, once testing completes. I am not, however, taking this PR because this issue is pretty much resolved, and I understand there's another nvptx issue with weakundef symbols yet to be resolved, so I'm leaving this PR for that.=