From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 12AB83858CD1; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:14:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 12AB83858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705572870; bh=ffYGL+FM8mcXi8JJoxwEwETd8BRDUo0h9jEIuuorfeo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bdp54JlKVGhbWlkrUeUJr3Bl7HTy7q3t0kgzRC7itp0wPymas0GUXD0Z+WPjuc5wk lg/416fxaN2czWK+C5WYeGpJ9wW3FM2IaHKUmhf7TGnJ8iBFuqsqLkYHRknwGZ9y3F Ie5ppC0QIfpzO3roWxdOT1psPdIwNnGVbOOjqQ+Q= From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112862] [14 regression] gfortran.dg coarray tests FAIL on macOS 12+ Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:14:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112862 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- > OK. So I realise the reason you see this and I wasn't: I have the habit of > installing before running the testsuite. When I test uninstalled, then I= get > the issue. Right: I always avoid installing before testing to make extra certain to test the freshly built bits and nothing else. > Now I have a concern that we have instances of -Bpath/to/libsomething/.li= bs > that are present to allow for specs substitution and we also need them for > providing run paths at test time. BUT, we do not want duplicates (since,= that > triggers a different warning for some Xcode versions, and is inefficient = anyway > - albeit probably a very minor contribution to testing time). Still there is going to be an impact, even on non-Darwin. However, this duplication of -B and -L options is present all over the testsuite already, just nobody cared to do something about it so far. Those Xcode 15 ld warnings my change this, though... > So I think that gcc/lib/gfortran.exp needs to have the library -B/-L addi= tions > structured so that only one set gets added. I'll draft a patch for you t= o try. Great, thanks.=