From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 761C53858C5E; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:48:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 761C53858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706107722; bh=uuAlkfWwM3FC27frSTAKvcGk1RjhuQpZCsSHerhhnXE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YyiUyLKRXAagoD1tLsT9lh7k2rB0QlEuuvHfLVbopyM9nEETTlorsRbQ39OLalY/s Ng2yB2fyidY4KBk8+Yhd5QovBr1Qs/Djj6ESQqUK72uSkJfH8FsQeVsA2J7sz6K2EB wDMjY4IkT5hZF7ymBwZ99DhgtQ25/xFFChm/54dA= From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112862] [14 regression] gfortran.dg coarray tests FAIL on macOS 12+ Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:48:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112862 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #8) > Again tested on macOS 11 (unchanged) and 14. On the latter, the previous > failures > to find libatomic.1.dylib have been traded for >=20 > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_1.f90 -fcoarray=3Dsingle -O2 (test= for > excess errors) > Excess errors:=20 > ld: warning: duplicate -rpath > '/private/var/gcc/regression/master/14-gcc/build/x86_64-apple-darwin23.2.= 0/ > libatomic/.libs' ignored >=20 > This is definitely progress ;-) hmm I wonder where this is coming from .. as you noted there is a bit of a tendency in the testsuite to add stuff somewhat randomly.=