From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6C6F93858CDA; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 21:18:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6C6F93858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712697481; bh=SdR7VLF1fHOfmY6azfjBrL76m4TGt1Xh34/OKWTPJSU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JvYHLYtqGF2Smt3msk12pzN8ULaJYYviEoOEiQ6yDdFoEfQ99li6XTCt4pqfyj6YT mnUhg5DOawczzWRkL09oQAuYhFZN6+QpAOCYqCZVmJXf/39MGp9KYU9JR3S96BRiA2 /LIWUYaHH8BnrA0FHrCRjQytn6gHKsnPTUJ9vuLI= From: "ibhagat at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/112878] ICE: in ctf_add_slice, at ctfc.cc:499 with _BitInt > 255 in a struct and -gctf1 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:18:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ctf-debug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ibhagat at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibhagat at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112878 --- Comment #5 from Indu Bhagat --- Hmm, thanks. Using sorry in some cases will be a viable option. For this specific case though, I am thinking emitting CTF_K_UNKNOWN instead should be okay. We have precedent in CTF generation in GCC where if a type= is not representable, we use a type of kind CTF_K_UNKNOWN instead.=