From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 75DBF385C407; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:20:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 75DBF385C407 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701883250; bh=2P8vSHrMWTFDXXIkuv+xTaCo27lhoqLEd+qDloNaNhk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ruzWZxT2c8wOhTfKHMktlQTG2WH/TrB/oTIOpQhHLclz7j4SYBkiJl3BPBtYw3sMz 4i7qFr7WkkIXmObLnIsh+dTUvQrbfw6ckQ7Qttrd78s71j93kz9J8Wb2NGVUnTA4RI FY/kajkseLAViKBrtep3ePHqohFy6ghHKC+vHpoU= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/112882] [14 Regression] std::clamp no longer usable in header only mode Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 17:20:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112882 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This minimal fix is enough to remove the reference to __glibcxx_assert_fail when optimization is enabled (at any level): --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ namespace std # define __glibcxx_assert(cond)=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 \ do { \ - if _GLIBCXX17_CONSTEXPR (_GLIBCXX_DO_ASSERT) \ + if (_GLIBCXX_DO_ASSERT) \ if (__builtin_expect(!bool(cond), false))=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 \ _GLIBCXX_ASSERT_FAIL(cond); \ } while (false) But we still need the more complete fix for -O0.=