From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3E9F23857C4D; Thu,  7 Dec 2023 08:23:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E9F23857C4D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701937400;
	bh=Qk7AM5ExKc78Wr4M0ux3zqzrCqH5m5jdGkhpn9dvJKI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uW9oD3QpBMm2nJWiNwtsQVuyQm8/jLQvtYyvfV24ETFXnyj9mV0d5PZeoCkMoMNfF
	 0ZKPi8AvEPoK9WVbKhuA6vn0Bqfvx5VHZh4fkJTGZChzZfAY1rN2SWlQIue3Q1/eum
	 I1GEHp5l/Sdx033LDWSQhmFTRCiBfGMCkV3f4c2E=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/112882] [14 Regression] std::clamp no longer usable
 in header only mode
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:23:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112882-4-foScOp0KuH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112882

--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Awesome! Thanks for taking a look!

> > It seems that undefining `_GLIBCXX_VERBOSE_ASSERT` gets it to go to
> > `__builtin_abort()` which makes it work again.
> >=20
> > If this change was intentional, would it be possible to make
> > `_GLIBCXX_VERBOSE_ASSERT` user configurable?
>=20
> You can use --disable-libstdcxx-verbose for that, or do you need to contr=
ol
> it during preprocessing?

Yeah I meant during preprocessing, we distribute the library as source to
client too, so would be harder if they'd also need to recompile the toolcha=
in
:)

Thanks for the fixes!=