From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C03673858289; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 15:20:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C03673858289 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701876027; bh=NQE9YCI9NsvEiyHIYhdcUc0c6XKQh08qCc1iTGsVvOg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=IwhEH8H17isZ4apKKb+JzWJXExtZyfU31FwSQRcLxkpl8GBMM9oTjWfivQ+ywwCqe dXLzYIeB/rlR+UsaEFUQPA3xIqKsw1JOFxjP5TeRY0MGr2JR7MDtOlxuzbdhyuivRV kt8uHwbRkR2zvNpJ7s4RTCH2KPeTL0x+ubecbOAA= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/112882] New: [14 Regression] std::clamp no longer usable in header only mode Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 15:20:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112882 Bug ID: 112882 Summary: [14 Regression] std::clamp no longer usable in header only mode Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I know this is not a supported scenario, but I'm wondering if it's still ea= sy to support. We have some libraries that use C++ mostly as an abstraction layer and try = to ensure that it needs no runtime support from libstdc++. A recent commit: g:5e8a30d8b8f4d7ea0a8340b46c1e0c865dbde781 changed how `__glibcxx_assert` is defined and now always calls `std::__glibcxx_assert_fail`. This means that now you always need libstdc++ even in contex where things w= ould have been folded away before. Similarly we're getting the same thing throu= gh usage of `std::unique_ptr`. It seems that undefining `_GLIBCXX_VERBOSE_ASSERT` gets it to go to `__builtin_abort()` which makes it work again. If this change was intentional, would it be possible to make `_GLIBCXX_VERBOSE_ASSERT` user configurable?=