From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 68D143857C7A; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:17:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 68D143857C7A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702459044; bh=6J8Jt73vQ/IbX1MEoVW51pnDQfB+NMHTt0PeWhXnR0M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mQZtynd4GPVjd8ecebBQyjytU0RdENFCEcZpZh+k5HnDjo80QWwbNzsUV4KsNt1PU xAi1YlGsGhs2iEqOtPnIf1flI+p2PqqXwAO4+9RLyvXHxf/F1mTPdsrMctBL76IQ5T gV54twk7KBPZGP9YwlZmOXcIFTui9utRhUUmXVWc= From: "fkastl at suse dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112916] [14 Regression] ~4-7% exec time regression of 433.milc on AMD Zen2 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:17:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fkastl at suse dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112916 --- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl --- Sometimes there are gaps in the data our team gathers, unfortunately. One c= ause can be that upstream GCC temporarily fails to build a benchmark. That shoul= dn't matter in this case I think. The last gap for this benchmark was in Septemb= er.=