From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A79FB3858D39; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 12:25:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A79FB3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712579140;
	bh=vlMI5xFYPEQnwTLEy3NtDj4TMKtYb10aQGiPsgVsJlU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MYX6YH1j96dRdl+MyZ+i7JGi5KnlsIJoDL1k9onM6IqDuwPf3wxB/hW36ldI73TbG
	 SZKH7fRskmVY2nGCncwsoYVXYbD/NHVEjoU/up6QA/Gt+JTbY1LZzwA6In2nXA8xy3
	 VE/Neqz1h0ApPlARf7gw5vfnr0kefl30tZtpSoao=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112919] LoongArch: Alignments in tune parameters are not
 precise and they regress performance
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:25:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-112919-4-HdlHSRPZal@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112919-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112919-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112919

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #23 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So fixed.=