From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2DEB43858C2A; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 01:55:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2DEB43858C2A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702346128; bh=xFqZX8S1UicF3uoMtvdfLoTv0AExp7u8m3SDrsw9LFk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S/vcv2tYyB//rWpbeT/VGQQbVG9zeu4srH+9JjX8v7U3CQNxbLclyFWXbp3P8tUDR Pk7HPFZwqVNdoQvgmWvZrRHf89OtH3S58503ETpt4hpuhjE63/scXp4ufyLrVEBulz 6UO0s/L7XWMt2M4hS72fNEba0k/+WUDnUiGlL/yo= From: "chenglulu at loongson dot cn" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112919] LoongArch: Alignments in tune parameters are not precise and they regress performance Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 01:55:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: chenglulu at loongson dot cn X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112919 --- Comment #5 from chenglulu --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > Lulu: can you help to run some other benchmarks like SPEC (I don't have an > access to it) and update these values for LA464 and LA664? No problem, this is what I should do. However, there are many parameter combinations, so the time may be longer.=