From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AF3563858D28; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:22:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AF3563858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711977735; bh=y95doHvAVDRvlB2ppJxSCnyXbk3/Lya/ergEXrgkiYA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z54WTiheaQQjey8EXTdMDUCsVvS09ArSNWaHAAL7K+iXcK5B3dEZe+cEdVBEWzdUh 9lCo02CAjlJY00knWvsyYA0VUT2/QzyePCslz1A8MYpLpuok98uQcNLDKTJABPcZov 1HT74VZKEeXcptXrMoOqGF6uH2BY9y/PJ29zmNKc= From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112919] LoongArch: Alignments in tune parameters are not precise and they regress performance Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 13:22:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112919 --- Comment #20 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #19) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #18) > > (In reply to chenglulu from comment #17) > >=20 > > > The results of spec2006 on LA464 are: > > > -falign-labels=3D4 -falign-functions=3D32 -falign-loops=3D16 -falign-= jumps=3D16 > >=20 > > Would you send a patch for them or prefer I to do it? >=20 > I'll send a patch tomorrow. Ping. I'd like to do another system rebuild after this patch lands for verifying = GCC 14.=