From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0EF433858D20; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:05:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0EF433858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1708455936; bh=gi0Y8WFlrJ1trrKcYw1/ktZB3+Cf9eGvMxXM1csaYSE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MZLbxhUOG6cC3BWNX1C14ESsi9p3tfckxSfVLNpjVe6HKPUoU16u/KCC5fIFsOTLI 82uZi6R9m/pZaaCLmO+EA+Bt9BvLZzMIwrtxdEQOKWaa+nuN3Uf7tqqCtk12pdgael 0KnfiHza5evyK1KBmOxegHB3ZObpwzd9HJcahRek= From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112922] [14 Regression] 465.tonto from SPECFP 2006 fails train run on Aarch64-linux with -O2 and -flto Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:05:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112922 --- Comment #2 from Richard Sandiford --- I don't remember there being a deliberate bug fix in that patch, but there were some others later. I suppose the optimistic case is that this first went latent and then was fixed =E2=80=9Cproperly=E2=80=9D afterwards. But it could just be latent.=