public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112922] New: 465.tonto from SPECFP 2006 fails train run on Aarch64-linux with -O2 and -flto
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:56:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112922
Bug ID: 112922
Summary: 465.tonto from SPECFP 2006 fails train run on
Aarch64-linux with -O2 and -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 26163
Target Milestone: ---
Host: aarch64-linux
Target: aarch64-linux
At some point between r14-6211-g056cce412862f8 and
r14-6290-g9f0f7d802482a8 465.tonto started to fail its train run when
compiled with -O2 -g -flto and PGO on Aarch64-linux.
My Aarch64 machine is a bit slow so I'd like to ask someone with a
spare modern one to bisect this to an exact revision. I do not
observe the failure on x86_64 (and so for now I have guessed its
component is "target").
The miscomparison is:
0056: SCF Energy = -407.833257
SCF Energy = -878703.963298
^
0057: Kinetic Energy = 406.333744
Kinetic Energy = 426.858584
^
0087: Chi^2 in F = 4.143448
Chi^2 in F = 19.253240
^
0088: Goodness of fit in F = 2.035546
Goodness of fit in F = 4.387851
^
0089: R factor in F = 0.046861
R factor in F = 0.096290
^
0090: Weighted R factor in F = 0.054923
Weighted R factor in F = 0.118393
^
0098: Secondary extinction factor = -0.000010
Secondary extinction factor = -0.000075
^
0100: Scale factor = 1.010260
Scale factor = 1.023437
^
0105: 0 0.140000 4.143448 -407.833257 *Damping on
0 0.140000 19.253240 -878703.963298 *Damping on
^
0108: 1 0.140000 4.844793 -406.881314
1 0.140000 105.264541 -1961055.460671
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 14:56 jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-12-08 19:28 ` [Bug target/112922] [14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-20 11:56 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-20 19:05 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-23 14:17 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-112922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).