From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 729353857711; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 729353857711
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1702497827;
	bh=6Lag0pVuw8CLV5Cu8e/wAVk1QxfSJV7cBgIoIDQo/K8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tBXveJit3+If1d59DMrNqd7PEgJKOLu4NkTavFPqdVFd/VWwEWy0mU4vZ5ZvWXLBq
	 sPNsc98BJ2RDacyYyKglM0QC6yPPDgq9aXEadDEnXD6keJabUuIa6fiWIDXNg0dW9S
	 /Dq6DrZN5jnehcM6vvp8CX1qD344t4Caop1BilN0=
From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE:
 in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126
 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:03:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zsojka at seznam dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112941-4-e1uxuCh7d7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112941

--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>=20
> Slightly more reduced:
> ```
> _BitInt (2049) b2049;
> unsigned _BitInt (6384) b16384;
>=20
> void
> foo (signed char t)
> {
>   b2049 =3D b16384 * t;
> }
>=20
> ```

Thank you for the further reduction.
In the original testcase, foo() and bar() trigger different ICE ( :2126 and
:2134 )=