From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 408EC385841C; Thu,  2 May 2024 12:14:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 408EC385841C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714652061;
	bh=KIzKHKFJhdNB+mMd2GvtwFUYOiETux0/Ntv+vRtxNLg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UxiO9ZofZquvkbGJE5e8CMYC0ymFnG8kifV7jZZt7cXQMhYVnb5KHjtuoC+e2mR2q
	 L6LeaBmErLztlwwH/7LJkkpkYl7+WUkPK+u1vU5ROCjdsikRKpFA/q/kGeLFqAEqEY
	 Y4A/o69PgxfWMgF/QdAT/WYadyADejb5PojvCOB8=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14/15 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't
 compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 12:14:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112958-4-IfmhFAUh8B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112958-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112958-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112958

--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot U=
ni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
> FreeBSD i386 is on it's way out: FreeBSD 14 is the last series supporting
> it; FreeBSD 15 is dropping support for it.

Ah, I wasn't aware of that (and was particularly interested in i386 for
comparison with Solaris/i386 asan).

> Can we disable libgnat (or GNAT) support during configure time?

Sure: --disable-libasan should work for every toplevel library, although
there's little point in building GNAT without the runtime libs.  Given
that there's no --disable-languages (I've filed a PR for that ages ago,
I believe), you have to use

        --enable-languages=3D<list of every language you want to build
                            execept for ada>

instead of

        --enable-languages=3Dall --disable-languages=3Dada=