* [Bug ada/112958] [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-11 10:21 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-09 10:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-12-11 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-11 10:21 ` [Bug ada/112958] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-09 10:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-09 13:56 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-09 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2024-01-09
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The code is the same on the 13 branch though, does it compile there?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-11 10:21 ` [Bug ada/112958] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-09 10:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-09 13:56 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-01-09 18:18 ` [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2024-01-09 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The code is the same on the 13 branch though, does it compile there?
So far, I had only tried gcc 11.4.0 (where the code compiles) and trunk
(where it doesn't). Now, I've tried both the gcc-12 and gcc-13 branches
and both fail like trunk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-09 13:56 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2024-01-09 18:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-09 18:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-09 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[14 regression] |[12/13/14 regression]
|s-exnllf.ads etc. don't |s-exnllf.ads etc. don't
|compile on 32-bit |compile on 32-bit
|FreeBSD/x86 |FreeBSD/x86
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-09 18:18 ` [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-09 18:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-10 9:09 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-09 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Someone motivated enough should add a specific libgnat/s-dorepr__freebsd.adb
unit where Rep64 is an array of two Interfaces.Unsigned_64 and the AND
operation on line 88 is performed on the first component.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-09 18:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-10 9:09 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-05-01 14:13 ` [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14/15 " gerald at pfeifer dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2024-01-10 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Someone motivated enough should add a specific libgnat/s-dorepr__freebsd.adb
> unit where Rep64 is an array of two Interfaces.Unsigned_64 and the AND
> operation on line 88 is performed on the first component.
Thanks for the analysis. I guess I'll leave that to the FreeBSD folks
then: this was just one of many issues I found during a trunk FreeBSD
bootstrap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14/15 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-10 9:09 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2024-05-01 14:13 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2024-05-02 12:14 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-05-07 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2024-05-01 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
FreeBSD i386 is on it's way out: FreeBSD 14 is the last series supporting
it; FreeBSD 15 is dropping support for it.
Can we disable libgnat (or GNAT) support during configure time?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14/15 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-01 14:13 ` [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14/15 " gerald at pfeifer dot com
@ 2024-05-02 12:14 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-05-07 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2024-05-02 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
> FreeBSD i386 is on it's way out: FreeBSD 14 is the last series supporting
> it; FreeBSD 15 is dropping support for it.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that (and was particularly interested in i386 for
comparison with Solaris/i386 asan).
> Can we disable libgnat (or GNAT) support during configure time?
Sure: --disable-libasan should work for every toplevel library, although
there's little point in building GNAT without the runtime libs. Given
that there's no --disable-languages (I've filed a PR for that ages ago,
I believe), you have to use
--enable-languages=<list of every language you want to build
execept for ada>
instead of
--enable-languages=all --disable-languages=ada
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14/15 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86
2023-12-11 10:21 [Bug ada/112958] New: [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-02 12:14 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2024-05-07 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|14.0 |14.2
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 14.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 14.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread