From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0F1AD386EC0B; Mon, 13 May 2024 08:57:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F1AD386EC0B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715590649;
	bh=9GMCQFxAu8KeWgt0msca2zaX4sblQD158VOXXirSogw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=w47DhxXOfrupcnl2SCfOJJLU8UPAwx2/VvNVcRuS84Kv/hy495akic6wkaZOTYH/k
	 SLrOVn/rlZhJgagKLP3YndsQkh9Lgzm8BB1KglU7LpQnZb5ca1tQ3VxkN5140zjdxy
	 IPpL4ha1Cv51tWoDdvBV5SwANBeRzhV1NlwZGjGk=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112959] install.tex needs updates on FreeBSD
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 08:57:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gerald at pfeifer dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112959-4-HguSDxBWhW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112959

--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #11 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #6)
>> What's there looks good to me.
>
> Cool, thank you. I cherry picked the changes I made to the GCC 14=20
> branch, so they should be in the GCC 14.2 release.

Great, thanks.

>> However, one issue mentioned in PR target/112959 is missing, namely the
>> problem of getting a working Ada bootstrap compiler. I have no idea if
>> gnat12 has been fixed since and is now able to build Ada on trunk/the
>> gcc-14 branch.  Otherwise, the old GNAT 6.4.1 worked for me, but this
>> isn't easy to find.
>
> Looking at the lang/gnat12 and now lang/gcc13 ports and recent changes
> including ones like
[...]
> (which was a few days after this report was filed) I am hopefully it would
> work. However, I cannot guarantee.
>
> I am temped to mark this report as RESOLVED based on my changes.

I tend to agree: if someone runs into GNAT problems in the future, they
can report them anew.=