From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 057BF3857BAD; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:38:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 057BF3857BAD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702373927; bh=exA7Qm5ZeMpPnjIS04uNa2CdPtfpc4LeHfYLoa13RjQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fJboKhsRaE2swp2yHq6W+HUWjk27hsdmbXMeoMuL2MyvrZiPHIBMZGok3m/PIQbrt TUUmdhRb8HIthmTeSJsfH6m+AETJeX7ulp31moHW7wgMd+DHIKptT9Ga96Bsl59vSn aD+XAQrbPb9P9G9hrFAK0lG46GXpok931eYZVuz0= From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112962] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in operator() (recog.h:431) with -fexceptions -mssse3 and __builtin_ia32_pabsd128() Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:38:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112962 --- Comment #4 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I was thinking whether it wouldn't be better to expand x86 const or pure > builtins when lhs is ignored to nothing in the expanders. Yes, this could be a better solution.=