From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6E7023858C78; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:15:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6E7023858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702376152; bh=iPADicwAGxHz9Ws9RRwRu3Te//i68C4DfenTmIr/wIM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Mk5tbfUMi8PkCZN5LBcz1eMByPsVr3cdRJcVy4rHp5WKZxN9e6HW953W6qSQgBUgF PCwgqeZ9xK2Ii9r5tDd4FnoAbJ2pOIkASBjgdyNwuZviKOD6vjUVXdsI0PK+znPjAW sj3u/iy4Mp6vI+NNOfgJm2GVImN8+bRSmcbx0944= From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112962] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in operator() (recog.h:431) with -fexceptions -mssse3 and __builtin_ia32_pabsd128() Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:15:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112962 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ubizjak at gmail dot com |unassigned at gcc d= ot gnu.org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #10 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > but with -fexceptions (and probably because we incorrectly don't mark the > builtins nothrow?) this doesn't happen. Maybe we should finally fix the above nothrow issue?=