From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7778D385C6D6; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:59:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7778D385C6D6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702421970; bh=YK37DkS/TohcQNNvyTWhEa0A6WdE3JY52n79R8RxdRQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=THhmHl//BdUwEB0FEbU1+JjLmlVj2nSqcwUrwl7ka1e9sBrkcwYRUHIqfoNBwqszm 0KfHn8hsrn0MAOhXfv/MQ1LHgx62Io4EumBNqrOh6bw7OW+NbF2oteUrtrl9yeASLK +aHCxIpY+6Rv8/zXC8fcADNjStkeqZPIclD3cinU= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112962] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in operator() (recog.h:431) with -fexceptions -mssse3 and __builtin_ia32_pabsd128() Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:59:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112962 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > I think e.g. aarch64 doesn't set nothrow on builtins with > -fnon-call-exceptions if they might raise floating point exceptions or > read/write memory. That is correct, see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107209#= c7 for a change related to aarch64's builtins and non-call exceptions and folding there.=