From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DEB4E385B52A; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:26:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DEB4E385B52A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1702380408;
	bh=5yRr+HollDoASmgvPgQhHT4qulow0PDCW/95IwOI8p0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=p1OM78mXnCmnnQ2voqQfZZKCbIDJU0PgXWh/z6ZIplZ/hY4p4DFh54U1hq03U1Cm1
	 gjJC//sWVtG+23vRsATezzh5Ib5bVIH61ryVV4DTG2T0hkK8CaUyOGXizwg5VuY5j5
	 DdSzdy/uk039xGq8OeykbmRBU9qQGCGrtRGOUe4w=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112962] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
 operator()<rtx_def*, rtx_def*> (recog.h:431) with -fexceptions -mssse3 and
 __builtin_ia32_pabsd128()
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:26:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-112962-4-lQGsib5jIR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112962-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112962-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112962

--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 56864
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D56864&action=3Dedit
gcc14-pr112962-2.patch

And another one for nothrow/leaf.  I'm too lazy to figure out the exact det=
ails
for -fnon-call-exceptions, will defer that to somebody who cares about those
and has time to figure out all the details.
I think e.g. aarch64 doesn't set nothrow on builtins with -fnon-call-except=
ions
if they might raise floating point exceptions or read/write memory.=