From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A39DA385DC11; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:40:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A39DA385DC11 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702536041; bh=pQ9as/v3vlRQjOJAG7yjjgeXU7tK5Ca1p1dm3e9UWBA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FZMagp2QwRMcyPqSUiaK3brFJxDo8QTDH9fOds5Yc3tdNBYCnfAe8qEt46S7jyUBs LNOZapSqzoCYgq9htHhZ7wXZE8bisRQuRlYFf4QFNXVqaZAgI2ftLSn3eX6IEmzXT3 bmPulBQkcAIH3CAU9Pjwb6sJYxe4w++1xmzXT93A= From: "22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112986] s390x gcc O2, O3: Incorrect logic operation in < comparison with the same values Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:40:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: 22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112986 --- Comment #5 from =EA=B9=80=EB=8C=80=EC=98=81 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 d= ot sen.go.kr> --- Thank you for your response. Naturally, I anticipated that the issue might = be with the s390x architecture cross-compiler. However, unexpectedly, I was unaware that qemu was generating incorrect instructions during the binary execution process=