From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E682C3858C5E; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 08:48:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E682C3858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703234933; bh=rKoJaE6JGp9GovvR8emeD9el7SHYXYxxLq2K6ssAri4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iNdcbFqHXwhFiP/jQKo1VrVDhjzHelgkp4gyhQhrQPvHgMdVN9Pm/0ZZlV0DLckar JX3HVUIz11l136f2OMbNh3tY0iDu+WZx5cd26JHbWOhvZKPCvEQBkiiVeq9ZJIx32x PeMDB+wgmKvun+QSPFQEyO+wr2Jk9rLMpsDvYIOg= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/113005] 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90', 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' execution test timeouts Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 08:48:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113005 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I can confirm that on x86_64-linux with 16 cores/32 threads even the -O0 rwlock_1 and rwlock_3 tests aren't that slow, byt with OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D10= 24 and higher rwlock_1 STOPs: $ OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D256 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../.libs/ time ./rwlock_1.exe 2.21user 8.88system 0:00.88elapsed 1260%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 47324maxresident)k 0inputs+206848outputs (0major+29321minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D512 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../.libs/ time ./rwlock_1.exe 4.59user 14.41system 0:02.29elapsed 829%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 89464maxresident)k 0inputs+413696outputs (0major+55232minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D1024 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../.libs/ time ./rwlock_1.exe STOP 2 STOP 2 Command exited with non-zero status 2 0.04user 0.78system 0:00.14elapsed 586%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 18976maxresident)k 0inputs+1672outputs (2major+4138minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D1024 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../.libs/ time ./rwlock_3.exe 13.57user 49.00system 0:17.66elapsed 354%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 26588maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1major+5987minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D2048 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../.libs/ time ./rwlock_3.exe 38.15user 134.83system 0:51.26elapsed 337%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 45860maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+10844minor)pagefaults 0swaps=