public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lipeng.zhu at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/113005] 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90', 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' execution test timeouts
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 06:22:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113005-4-imzbF48DHR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113005
--- Comment #12 from Lipeng Zhu <lipeng.zhu at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Lipeng Zhu from comment #9)
> Since I still can't reproduce the failure on my side :(, just curious, will
> the new added 'rwlock' test cases failed on mutex lock?
OK, I rerun these rwlock* test cases on mutex lock, it reported the similar
error:
$ export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1024 && time ./rwlock_1.exe
At line 28 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit =
1017, file = '***_tst.dat')
Fortran runtime error: End of file
STOP 2
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit =
587)
Internal Error: Unit number changed
Error termination. Backtrace:
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit =
732)
Internal Error: Unit number changed
Error termination. Backtrace:
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit =
963)
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit =
980)
Internal Error: Unit number changed
Internal Error: Unit number changed
Error termination. Backtrace:
Error termination. Backtrace:
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit =
421)
Internal Error: Unit number changed
Error termination. Backtrace:
#0 0x7ff587881223 in already_open
#0 0x7ff587881223 in already_open
#0 0x7ff587881223 in already_open
at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
#1 0x400def in ???
#1 0x400def in ???
#1 0x400def in ???
#0 0x7ff587881223 in already_open
at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
#1 0x400def in ???
#0 0x7ff587881223 in already_open
at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
#1 0x400def in ???
#2 0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3 0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#2 0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3 0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4 0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#4 0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#5 0xffffffffffffffff in ???
#5 0xffffffffffffffff in ???
#2 0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3 0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4 0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#2 0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
#5 0xffffffffffffffff in ???
at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3 0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4 0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#5 0xffffffffffffffff in ???
#2 0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3 0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4 0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#5 0xffffffffffffffff in ???
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-25 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 20:46 [Bug libfortran/113005] New: " tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-21 11:41 ` [Bug testsuite/113005] " tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-21 11:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-21 11:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22 6:52 ` lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
2023-12-22 8:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22 8:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22 9:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22 9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22 9:59 ` lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
2023-12-22 11:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-25 2:55 ` lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
2023-12-25 6:22 ` lipeng.zhu at intel dot com [this message]
2023-12-25 7:31 ` lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
2024-01-22 1:02 ` lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113005-4-imzbF48DHR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).