From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 205B73858C20; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 06:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 205B73858C20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703485328;
	bh=BNumjPZ7tV/Z8trkHwA4gOkNvuN7wlGnJ8/WV79W4bQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=FQH06G6VzSNZWpWfCMeS6vg41jVxnKUqNAR2901Dgxu9ttarL1ZFKc/RXHXcodTfF
	 Av9Q39mxkLWIVXi3mP85PSBBJUDYYWnqEIOQ/MbZpX+QqPF3KmldHc2rNaVyOXM+bL
	 FmiD2EY6r8iefmX3qJANLL3bFBWgI2W4srQDzzMM=
From: "lipeng.zhu at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/113005] 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90',
 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' execution test timeouts
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 06:22:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113005-4-imzbF48DHR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113005

--- Comment #12 from Lipeng Zhu <lipeng.zhu at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Lipeng Zhu from comment #9)
> Since I still can't reproduce the failure on my side :(, just curious, wi=
ll
> the new added 'rwlock' test cases failed on mutex lock?

OK, I rerun these rwlock* test cases on mutex lock, it reported the similar
error:

$ export OMP_NUM_THREADS=3D1024 && time ./rwlock_1.exe
At line 28 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit=
 =3D
1017, file =3D '***_tst.dat')
Fortran runtime error: End of file
STOP 2
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit=
 =3D
587)
Internal Error: Unit number changed

Error termination. Backtrace:
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit=
 =3D
732)
Internal Error: Unit number changed

Error termination. Backtrace:
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit=
 =3D
963)
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit=
 =3D
980)
Internal Error: Unit number changed
Internal Error: Unit number changed

Error termination. Backtrace:

Error termination. Backtrace:
At line 17 of file
/home/lipzhu/codes/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90 (unit=
 =3D
421)
Internal Error: Unit number changed

Error termination. Backtrace:
#0  0x7ff587881223 in already_open
#0  0x7ff587881223 in already_open
#0  0x7ff587881223 in already_open
        at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
        at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
        at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
#1  0x400def in ???
#1  0x400def in ???
#1  0x400def in ???
#0  0x7ff587881223 in already_open
        at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
#1  0x400def in ???
#0  0x7ff587881223 in already_open
        at ../../../libgfortran/io/open.c:742
#1  0x400def in ???
#2  0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
        at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3  0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#2  0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
        at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3  0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4  0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#4  0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#5  0xffffffffffffffff in ???
#5  0xffffffffffffffff in ???
#2  0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
        at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3  0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4  0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#2  0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
#5  0xffffffffffffffff in ???
        at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3  0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4  0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#5  0xffffffffffffffff in ???
#2  0x7ff586e21d2d in gomp_thread_start
        at ../../../libgomp/team.c:129
#3  0x7ff5866081c9 in ???
#4  0x7ff586239e72 in ???
#5  0xffffffffffffffff in ???=