From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B10723858C74; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:52:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B10723858C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703227943;
	bh=eKki0ac3IvOW834sIvcFF2Bq7G9fgnAQIqOqETCa4SM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ro5brEEJrODvtghRmcLGtiqisx6m7Cr98QJInURhpRfOQ99NhQiGzi5K3xQY8aTF2
	 kZRZI/FTO4o/vD0NGVcG+S52RpVWgdI0VK7zTbl359BD5SbsWgMuOpTr+Fr2cVXtlk
	 rnE3dXv2keim9vYdiKs4im+RBs2ZW0y4p1AzeYQU=
From: "lipeng.zhu at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/113005] 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90',
 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' execution test timeouts
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:52:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lipeng.zhu at intel dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113005-4-vgEp9tonp0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113005

Lipeng Zhu <lipeng.zhu at intel dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lipeng.zhu at intel dot com

--- Comment #4 from Lipeng Zhu <lipeng.zhu at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Yeah, perhaps just num_threads(8) to all of those?
> Why is there
> total_threads =3D omp_get_max_threads ()
> btw, when nothing uses it?
Yes, this code is not used, we can delete it.=