From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4A36A3858401; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:47:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A36A3858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706132859;
	bh=L9S4Ug97B8ysU3aEEN0HwF9cIvIlgny8yKds7Vlthvw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yh8xWoSbz8bk+PGmyVsgUxM1HPzOnH+Mh6nXfusi5aDj4cXPh2lVJVMjAKVoB4GqN
	 Ni34PZJZHv0mh1Z1UKXcBiVr7PzZXl6CzfgKRVG+spMR9oFQT8PHgXVNJpiPwuA6c3
	 /y9oSlqAl6RP2txwrG8x3hEOrpcJf7WAXnPMenEs=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113010] [RISCV] sign-extension lost in comparison with
 constant embedded in comma-op expression
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:47:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113010-4-y8DYjyuayI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113010

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #8)
> From the CI run here:
> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20240116221914.267015-=
1-
> gkm@rivosinc.com/
>=20
> It looks like this issue also affects ARM since the testcase fails.

That is aarch32 (a ILP32 target) where long is the same size as int. I susp=
ect
you will end up with a failure even on i386 (32bit) with the current testca=
se.

I suspect you want to use either 0xffffffffull or limit it to `sizeof(long)=
 >
sizeof(int)` targets.=