From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 461563858401; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:05:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 461563858401 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704207959; bh=FaGPLxOaZHT4SoqzMw6nFzTjHm3YPoi8ahp275W/G3A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ubGqL+6tavB+td/Gs9zjM7SABMPMPxUM8OL+eg2K61OIhuAv527rDaIdS9TDzNAab JgHey44GpiIcvXX7xIcPrt3N5YjCosxHg1k2QECLBh5eqZx4XX0K2PxbvTdE6QwLOp /qk3BgH6KiZxL015UO3RFkGK65ETBV07osz95orQ= From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1 Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:05:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113045 --- Comment #22 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #21) > commit e75b54a2d932929a9b2e940c5aad1ef33a86c008 > Author: Richard Earnshaw > Date: Thu Mar 22 17:54:55 2012 +0000 >=20 > * lex.c (search_line_fast): Provide Neon-optimized version for ARM. Is the optimization still worthwhile some 12 years later ?=