From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BB0CF3858C5E; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:25:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BB0CF3858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706610342;
	bh=iorYxG5GxDr48DkkwkoX8cI8l7tQA9Te0T6LnnZVXMg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rHAyB9xm2CG6JpwBi015jmwRQZ7Mnpf+FxVZ3hhJV9bL5UQAvcgEwwOiOBDM4UbVB
	 ae8HbLe2v8fX8j6KyrJ3Vqwtn70Ka1T+2FHY6+77vFdbgjVZ1lOxZ7Xc4l306nExa7
	 nLrCWIQjUFACA2HldlPDP+rrLh6t8dIO5ZBIrx5g=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113059] [14 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32
 -march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:25:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113059-4-auYAd41UHK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113059

--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> The question is revert what exactly?
> If we revert r14-6210, we get back the other P1.  Or do you mean revert
> r14-5355?
> I guess another option is move the vzeroupper pass one pass later, i.e.
> after pass_gcse.

I think moving mdreorg passes as late as possible esp. when they don't play
well with DF/notes is a good thing.  Maybe even after pass_rtl_dse2 and
thus after shrink-wrapping?=