From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 577D93858D3C; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:21:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 577D93858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703283717; bh=Fh3Z/Euw5gb8DbDm/hV6pAuy2iLC2kBfTen+U+Yt1UQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nJjfdJmJ6TrC86VvVG/MGRmsJswL6YhlLk9/FZu5C4cv4cvZ2zdpd26QdhrG6Wvvf oppag66CnpCl38tbCFDY+xfKXIUqpLD0POmVyNh2uMDad3JloJt4b3genw5HlMZR8H KtS3u2u8xAQOP4uvMN0+qpljJ4XWY3PJRnrF70tc= From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:21:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113087 --- Comment #15 from JuzheZhong --- Currently, we don't have much run FAIL and ICE left in full coverage testin= g. I suspect it is very corner case in SPEC. You don't have to debug it. Just need to give me a preprocessed source file. Like this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110560 You can see google highway folks attachment is very big but I still can fix= the issue as long as you can give me some sources that I can reproduce the issu= es.=