From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B53B93858D39; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 21:04:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B53B93858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703279089;
	bh=+l77rjoK6Tu3iWJhxjoUkjsO+UqMYwATxCVKFV75qAQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=x234y7DpgNnSAQoYeHXNIaiStXfDoQxQ4T6DyDMf5W+++J9a0bR18NXSkfkFV7kUe
	 JZhKPT+UBrDCx5rvRDMjzWjineqddtzRHnUf6wLcuEMyA+Quc8dRwTi0wpKGzkGaQa
	 oN3covOSJxxQnkijo7DRBAUL+VSlfTJLJ4ZdjS2A=
From: "vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch
 with rv64gc
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 21:04:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113087-4-QSYK2QtphP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113087

--- Comment #14 from Vineet Gupta <vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #13)
> (In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #11)
> > > (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #10)
> > > > I've kicked off 2 spec runs (zvl 128 and 256) using r14-6765-g4d9e0=
f3f211.
> > > > I'll let you know the results when they finish.
> > >=20
> > > My terminal crashed - so these are partial results:
> > > zvl256: 3 runtime failures
> > > 531.deepsjeng
> > > ???
> > > ???

At least 549.fotonik3d runtime failure with vl256 remains even with
simple_vsetvl.=