From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 966FE3857437; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:45:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 966FE3857437 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703025930; bh=ouaafAiUYc8Q/TpVhRCDPP2p6Y3myzn40DA9gZ5Qwzk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QAX5kGYO0S73AI6WepnoL1zOdGraocznhrYRGt/tm2wMQNQ9za5X2VyRBCboDX47T TtoMAzopKnu2NxWEMV8KhGoTQK80SP1r0c1DLPaUDCgDHmn2Apgl9mfbwQ+aGHyKnS nOjnPda+XyWl+vHA8deOFXffxZuO+tn2L+l2DFXo= From: "patrick at rivosinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:45:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick at rivosinc dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113087 --- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill --- No, this is from a random generator but the 527/549 issues could be related? I haven't reduced spec fails.=