[Bug tree-optimization/113102] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV with _BitInt() at -O1 or -O2

["cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113102

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5198f0264e773d3b5d55f09a579313b0b231527

commit r14-6804-gf5198f0264e773d3b5d55f09a579313b0b231527
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 22 12:28:06 2023 +0100

    lower-bitint: Handle unreleased SSA_NAMEs from earlier passes gracefully
[PR113102]

    On the following testcase earlier passes leave around an unreleased
    SSA_NAME - non-GIMPLE_NOP SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT which isn't in any bb.
    The following patch makes bitint lowering resistent against those,
    the first hunk is where we'd for certain kinds of stmts try to ammend
    them and the latter is where we'd otherwise try to remove them,
    neither of which works.  The other loops over all SSA_NAMEs either
    already also check gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (s)) or it doesn't
    matter that much if we process it or not (worst case it means e.g.
    the pass wouldn't return early even when it otherwise could).

    2023-12-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/113102
            * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (gimple_lower_bitint): Handle unreleased
            large/huge _BitInt SSA_NAMEs.

            * gcc.dg/bitint-59.c: New test.