From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AE52D3858C2F; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 01:01:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE52D3858C2F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703379664;
	bh=fwTDB5O8kxURixO4kMHRAgW2g1GtSAB7JYgNHCWNM4E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qUsLjy5qIeicuVdw1aM/HpEqFoEhxS5bEn6McD+6rsG7cop6R6Cts/8aOhhZyA+jI
	 DQVDHYHcDnjsrjDDdwjyIPrl7tbVqNtUYYdhbWOaZC2ppe3pS+dvTY6bmR44lbZRBJ
	 M79usu3sZHIWfrAQoj5nzi8HDDOKyOKyVWRO9MQg=
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113109] [14 Regression] g++ EH tests fail at
 execution time for cris-elf after r14-6674-g4759383245ac97
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 01:01:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: EH, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113109-4-I4XKoU6aeW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113109

--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #8)
> I'm wondering if we need to revert r14-6674 to avoid this functionality
> issue. And revisit/enhance the patch later.

No need, not anymore; not because of this PR anyway.  I'm closing the bug, =
but
please don't back-port that commit (or at least, please back-port this comm=
it
as well if you do).

Happy holidays.=