From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8B4203858D3C; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:19:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8B4203858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703351981;
	bh=+ETZz/UYHqojwq1MTzZ5SiKGSdIzPgRHWfm2EwBb3kk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZGFw38fla4OvgiPFwf7TydCbe112VV9/j8FTTVG1nt9Qe1JYP9vDyvQwANeu/hlNN
	 nbiiutcjEhnTjm7BD2s57grH6mh9cjj7Ji1MVieZZH7+v04ao6+eKRjfgmLF9NhPI7
	 vBw50phsWeeplV9z6LRoRKkS565hS1HI2iW4HOrw=
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113109] [14 Regression] g++ EH tests fail at
 execution time for cris-elf after r14-6674-g4759383245ac97
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:19:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: EH, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113109-4-MaBsbFEIH7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113109

--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Hmm, see PR 32398 and PR 32769. PR 32769 is interesting because it was
> caused by the merge of the df branch where the store was being removed ju=
st
> like here on cris.=20
>=20
> Oh and reading
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/200707151749.l6FHnXrt010084@hiau=
ly1.
> hia.nrc.ca/

(the patch submission for those two PR's)

> even mentions this exact issue it seems where dse.cc is removing
> the store and such.
Thanks for the bug-archive-digging!  I decided on trying making the mem
volatile and I see PR32769 supports that; exactly the same thing!

I just wonder why it was seen with pa *then* and CRIS only *now*.=