public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113109] [14 Regression] g++ EH tests fail at execution time for cris-elf after r14-6674-g4759383245ac97
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 00:41:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113109-4-mGaCA6IyUq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113109

--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d03630b123411340e52d05124cb0cacfa1fc8b0

commit r14-6817-g3d03630b123411340e52d05124cb0cacfa1fc8b0
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 24 00:10:32 2023 +0100

    CRIS: Fix PR middle-end/113109; "throw" failing

    TL;DR: the "dse1" pass removed the eh-return-address store.  The
    PA also marks its EH_RETURN_HANDLER_RTX as volatile, for the same
    reason, as does visum.  See PR32769 - it's the same thing on PA.

    Conceptually, it's logical that stores to incoming args are
    optimized out on the return path or if no loads are seen -
    at least before epilogue expansion, when the subsequent load
    isn't seen in the RTL, as is the case for the "dse1" pass.

    I haven't looked into why this problem, that appeared for the PA
    already in 2007, was seen for CRIS only recently (with
    r14-6674-g4759383245ac97).

            PR middle-end/113109
            * config/cris/cris.cc (cris_eh_return_handler_rtx): New function.
            * config/cris/cris-protos.h (cris_eh_return_handler_rtx):
Prototype.
            * config/cris/cris.h (EH_RETURN_HANDLER_RTX): Redefine to call
            cris_eh_return_handler_rtx.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-24  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-22  2:12 [Bug middle-end/113109] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22  2:22 ` [Bug middle-end/113109] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22  2:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-22  2:51 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-23  2:42 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-23  6:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-23 17:19 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-23 17:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  0:19 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  0:34 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  0:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-12-24  0:58 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  1:01 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  1:01 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  1:16 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-24  9:13 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113109-4-mGaCA6IyUq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).