From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 71C2E3858407; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:12:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 71C2E3858407
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704874330;
	bh=C6YMhtM/dKIJzf9g8soRtY2zmcc4IVIZB1zrQeSoeH4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mDW3dXJlDor8EccJWMej265roRyzok67I28SzlVVWMGyO8UUmokCUp6I35CJVS5Hh
	 4aZX9SSGlXFrUWyq5xy/D3urOZ8pKwimTAFIbKNa890NVIVWcxCDwDiBBJiboGSIxI
	 RcokZSW5XA6TcBwGtcIeeG1QFhzeyLkcHROLJ0IY=
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113115] [14 Regression] ICE In
 extract_constrain_insn_cached recog.cc with ppc64le-linux-gnu crosscompiler
 from r14-3592-g9ea1248604d7b6
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:12:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113115-4-Hce91zAxck@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113115

--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> I really dislike the -mpower{8,9}-vector options, but maybe it's too late=
 to
> remove them for this release?  I'm not sure how involved/invasive that pa=
tch
> would be.  Segher, do you have a preference on remove them now or use the
> workaround above and remove in the next release?

(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> Using -mpower9-vector while not having -mcpu=3Dpower9 (or later) is wrong=
, and
> should
> not work.  Using -mno-power9-vector is just weird.
>=20
> If we can neuter the -mpower9-vector (etc.) options now, that would be go=
od.
> But
> there are some complications with the testsuite at least?

OK, it sounds that it's still acceptable to adjust this at this time point,=
 so
I'm working on a patch to evaluate its impact, will post it after full test=
ing.=