From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0BA79385842D; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 20:50:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0BA79385842D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704747060; bh=3tONDaj7eBxrn+BfMm+kC9pTugZsaSyWMkD3j7cP+dA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZuD8DYRQFgEE1Wl0xKDsNp/p6GLrVTCVdErnxUiBnNWj56C7hJ+A6j9zGBXgwzDmf qXL9ePkAl5fdsetmvmx4ftnJkVFToAAHNZOdt3X0xUhb1BRfmJ/agBBY4MAx1mTRBk Fbj0tdI7UIhAOjrnrZWnjZcyrT7fXUgMdlcpdMww= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113115] [14 Regression] ICE In extract_constrain_insn_cached recog.cc with ppc64le-linux-gnu crosscompiler from r14-3592-g9ea1248604d7b6 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:50:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113115 Peter Bergner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org, | |dje at gcc dot gnu.org, | |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org, | |segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- Ke Wen, is this just a duplicate of PR109987 and PR103627? I know it was bisected to Jeevitha's commit, but it seems more like her commit exposed the same latent issue as those other PRs, rather than causing it. Your thought= s?=