From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8BE983858C29; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 02:07:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8BE983858C29 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704766041; bh=STTo6IgdrsWo57Hq66D+yEjCsnVD1df0xLuNuHJp3II=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h4DEoLOOxyCTox7oN7z/GpvvxAGErNW3CNAY/6UqUuShIOJfMhaYDkJ7p1zFprV7r sDvf74yBQID3nYOeAfNgKCZwcGfn730bFTG7cBxOb7ERIsH1z6sVRYvtci531ANfNz Ui6V0z5SO/8+G0O3zKjr0Dyfq6P+BEmUOHP8oWB0= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113115] [14 Regression] ICE In extract_constrain_insn_cached recog.cc with ppc64le-linux-gnu crosscompiler from r14-3592-g9ea1248604d7b6 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 02:07:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113115 Kewen Lin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3) > Ke Wen, is this just a duplicate of PR109987 and PR103627? I know it was > bisected to Jeevitha's commit, but it seems more like her commit exposed = the > same latent issue as those other PRs, rather than causing it. Your thoug= hts? Yes, I agree it's duplicated of PR109987, Jeevitha's commit just exposed th= is known issue, since we are in stage 3, I wonder if we can go with power9-vec= tor guarding first (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587310.html) since power9-vector still exists in this release, and we can try to remove these workaround options in next release. (Sorry that I missed to follow up the power{8,9}-vector removal) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109987 ***=