From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4E0B63858C62; Wed,  3 Jan 2024 11:21:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E0B63858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704280908;
	bh=7zck8Mm1EJnt6eTrK/ABLX98FFUdekJZcPlJYLmGOmU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=A5rxbt1CO8sHOcKrm+emG7vCKzHaT1/hkZqavUpDHN3ozXZwjOmz5or+WcTfOF9mi
	 9nfdableRaAuOpaQQWuuBw4hyYwUmEMyGxdlMvkBa440J/HzZk0XPWygCp6sv6CDZ9
	 KxpU1hfScqnrBnqjr5Xedx3pncXcfa9mbPhSCc6c=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113116] [14 Regression] ~11-17% exec time regression of
 436.cactusADM on aarch64
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:21:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-113116-4-fE7IN2W7yZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113116

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-01-03
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #0)
> As seen on the graphs here
>=20
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D578.100.0
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D586.100.0
>=20
> between commits
> g:8e0568d8ac9dbfc8
> g:5641787abeea0fdc
>=20
> there is a slowdown of 436.cactusADM SPEC2006 benchmark, 11% for Ofast
> native LTO PGO and 17% for Ofast native LTO.


Did you mean -Ofast native PGO? both linked runs are PGO.

In any case, confirmed. Running bisect.=