From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 39B5D3858C62; Wed,  3 Jan 2024 11:30:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 39B5D3858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704281413;
	bh=R4BINnJYXcfFkQfPxE+E5x0dX4nkVLyUrBSIXb9mNyA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=O+vVs2h26Sxi9vfucRIFTaTr0vrLafe0I2VVa+Psc31DFXmUAgadIimNrPQ531pdA
	 +NN75/BZvEPVJIoB4OKSzeyQIsO4ndDcCCpgcvBfZw1BPStfHcDKbI4WFKcWPGvI/x
	 y7C+mVmSIL71zHOby5uKRAF8/YcTlj2Rnx/yYYzU=
From: "fkastl at suse dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113116] [14 Regression] ~11-17% exec time regression of
 436.cactusADM on aarch64
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:30:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fkastl at suse dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113116-4-xwbANOWuHP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113116

--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl <fkastl at suse dot cz> ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #2)
> Did you mean -Ofast native PGO? both linked runs are PGO.

Yes I did. I meant PGO and wrote LTO. My bad :).=