public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113119] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 18 does not dominate use in block 4 at -O1 with _BitInt Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:00:45 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-113119-4-IcsJUWIiND@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-113119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113119 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7590d975ecfdae4f112b5086c017101c08f07e3e commit r14-7000-g7590d975ecfdae4f112b5086c017101c08f07e3e Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Date: Mon Jan 8 13:57:26 2024 +0100 lower-bitint: Punt .*_OVERFLOW optimization if cast from IMAGPART_EXPR appears before REALPART_EXPR [PR113119] _BitInt lowering for .{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW calls which have both REALPART_EXPR and IMAGPART_EXPR used and have a cast from the IMAGPART_EXPR to a boolean or normal integral type lowers them at the point of the REALPART_EXPR statement (which is especially needed if the lhs of the call is complex with large/huge _BitInt element type); we emit the stmt to set the lhs of the cast at the same spot as well. Normally, the lowering of __builtin_{add,sub,mul}_overflow arranges the REALPART_EXPR to come before IMAGPART_EXPR, followed by cast from that, but as the testcase shows, a redundant __builtin_*_overflow call and VN can reorder those and we then ICE because the def-stmt of the former cast from IMAGPART_EXPR may appear after its uses. We already check that all of REALPART_EXPR, IMAGPART_EXPR and the cast from the latter appear in the same bb as the .{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW call in the optimization, the following patch just extends it to make sure cast appears after REALPART_EXPR; if not, we punt on the optimization and expand it as a store of a complex _BitInt on the location of the ifn call. Only the testcase in the testsuite is changed by the patch, all other __builtin_*_overflow* calls in the bitint* tests (and there are quite a few) have REALPART_EXPR first. 2024-01-08 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/113119 * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (optimizable_arith_overflow): Punt if both REALPART_EXPR and cast from IMAGPART_EXPR appear, but cast is before REALPART_EXPR. * gcc.dg/bitint-61.c: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-08 13:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-12-22 18:54 [Bug tree-optimization/113119] New: " zsojka at seznam dot cz 2023-12-22 21:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113119] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-23 7:41 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz 2023-12-23 9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-08 13:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-01-08 13:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-113119-4-IcsJUWIiND@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).