From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AE21A3858D37; Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:32:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE21A3858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703759547; bh=ud7igqlvDK3frZCsul+GngUyITcuOSxndyx42fMjmxI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YL2thAeBFkMH/4cNuYBN+lQwvQMNRhg5tIStO2+m4o5+JHXhHqZHPC5MJ8hzwAjEB KbKaL6HO140sNNbev8TDzqfuPP7bidBVj6b3K9fJMNBgbKNPQ/+kbJ3VQp5JkIYobF DsQeSuL4fVqcz3rcPCdTtDwnN33RBBTcus9YNLqY= From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/113124] g++ should relax designated initialiser rules for trivial classes (read: C structures) and C arrays. Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:32:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113124 Xi Ruoyao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao --- Today we really don't want to introduce fancy C++ extensions. Have you sent this as a proposal to the standard committee? FWIW the Linux kernel code base is not relevant because Linus has absolutel= y no intention to allow using C++ there.=